Calculator
Enter the Kaizen before-and-after metrics
Core logic: Annualized savings = recurring savings x yearly run rate
Calculator Library / Kaizen Finance
Convert before-and-after Kaizen results into annualized savings, payback, ROI, and a sigma-shift equivalent, then save projects into a portfolio view for a broader improvement dashboard.
Calculator
Core logic: Annualized savings = recurring savings x yearly run rate
Breakdown
| Source | Annual Savings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Time | $91,000 | 48.9% |
Portfolio
| Project | Annual Savings | ROI | Payback | Sigma Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No saved Kaizens yet. Click Save To Portfolio after calculating. | ||||
Instructions
The sigma-shift equivalent here is based on the improvement in defect rate converted to a long-term sigma estimate. It is a directional quality indicator, not a substitute for a full capability study.
Inventory savings are modeled as carrying-cost savings, not as immediate one-time cash recovery. If you want both views, add one-time cash impact separately in your business case.
This tool helps teams convert before-and-after improvement work into financial outcomes. It turns time savings, defect reduction, inventory reduction, and implementation cost into annualized savings, payback period, ROI, and a portfolio-level picture for multiple Kaizens.
Use it when improvement work is visible on the floor but still needs a stronger business case for leadership review or future project selection.
| Output | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized savings | Recurring monthly or periodic savings x yearly factor | Standardized value of the improvement over a year. |
| Payback period | Implementation cost / recurring savings rate | How long it takes for the project to recover its cost. |
| ROI | (Annual savings - project cost) / project cost | Relative financial return on the Kaizen effort. |
If a Kaizen reduces changeover time by 18 minutes per run across 400 runs per year, the saved capacity can be valued in labor and throughput terms. If the annualized savings total $48,000 and the implementation cost was $12,000, the payback is short and the ROI is substantial.
The calculator helps teams present that result clearly instead of relying on vague claims that the event “went well.”
Common categories include labor time, material loss, defect reduction, throughput gains, inventory reduction, and avoided downtime or warranty cost.
They can be tracked, but they should be labeled clearly. Decision quality improves when hard and soft savings are not blended carelessly.
Because a one-time gain that erodes in two months is not the same as a stable process improvement that survives normal operating pressure.
Annualizing savings without validating that the improved method was actually sustained or repeatable at real production volume.
Yes. A portfolio view helps leadership see cumulative improvement value rather than reviewing each event in isolation.
Use PDCA structure to hold the problem statement, pilot evidence, and standardization work behind the savings claim.
Use the guide for the broader philosophy, event discipline, and culture logic that turns one project into repeatable improvement behavior.